PITCHER MATCHUP

Sandy Alcantara vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sandy Alcantara's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sandy Alcantara's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .332vs RHH xwOBA .296Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 26%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Slider 15%Cutter 14%Sweeper 5%Curveball 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sandy Alcantara, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .331
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 AB Alec Bohm RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .369
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .377
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .442 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.