PITCHER MATCHUP

Sandy Alcantara vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sandy Alcantara's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sandy Alcantara's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 25%Changeup 23%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Slider 17%Cutter 13%Sweeper 3%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sandy Alcantara, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .374
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .438 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .372
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-17 game page →