PITCHER MATCHUP

Sandy Alcantara vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sandy Alcantara's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sandy Alcantara's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .339vs RHH xwOBA .285Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 26%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Cutter 14%Slider 14%Sweeper 5%Curveball 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sandy Alcantara, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 635 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-14 game page →