PITCHER MATCHUP

Sandy Alcantara vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sandy Alcantara's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sandy Alcantara's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .295Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 26%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Slider 16%Cutter 14%Sweeper 5%Curveball 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sandy Alcantara, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 466 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SF Sal Frelick LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Jackson Chourio SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CY Christian Yelich LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-17 game page →