PITCHER MATCHUP

Sandy Alcantara vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sandy Alcantara's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sandy Alcantara's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .339vs RHH xwOBA .281Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 26%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Cutter 14%Slider 14%Sweeper 5%Curveball 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sandy Alcantara, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 594 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.