PITCHER MATCHUP

Sandy Alcantara vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sandy Alcantara's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sandy Alcantara's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .332vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 27%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Slider 14%Cutter 14%Sweeper 5%Curveball 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sandy Alcantara, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 552 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 496 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 408 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.