PITCHER MATCHUP

Sandy Alcantara vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sandy Alcantara's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sandy Alcantara's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .339vs RHH xwOBA .281Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 26%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Cutter 14%Slider 14%Sweeper 5%Curveball 2%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sandy Alcantara, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 HB Henry Bolte RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .412 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 MM Max Muncy RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.