PITCHER MATCHUP

Sandy Alcantara vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sandy Alcantara's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sandy Alcantara's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .340vs RHH xwOBA .284Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 26%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Cutter 14%Slider 14%Sweeper 5%Curveball 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sandy Alcantara, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.