PITCHER MATCHUP

Sam Aldegheri vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sam Aldegheri's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sam Aldegheri's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .365vs RHH xwOBA .355Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Changeup 28%Slider 11%Curveball 10%Cutter 5%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sam Aldegheri, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 HB Henry Bolte RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-28 game page →