PITCHER MATCHUP

Sam Aldegheri vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sam Aldegheri's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sam Aldegheri's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .382vs RHH xwOBA .358Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Changeup 28%Curveball 10%Slider 9%Cutter 5%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sam Aldegheri, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 489 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DW Donovan Walton LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Alika Williams RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alika Williams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.