PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryne Nelson vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryne Nelson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryne Nelson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .330vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 60%Slider 14%Cutter 12%Curveball 10%Changeup 3%Sinker 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryne Nelson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 475 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DW Donovan Walton LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (60% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.