PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryne Nelson vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryne Nelson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryne Nelson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .327vs RHH xwOBA .322Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 59%Slider 15%Cutter 12%Curveball 10%Changeup 3%Sinker 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryne Nelson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (59% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (59% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (59% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (59% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (59% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (59% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (59% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (59% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (59% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.