PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Yarbrough vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Yarbrough's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Yarbrough's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .251vs RHH xwOBA .335Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Cutter 24%Sweeper 21%Changeup 20%Sinker 19%Four-Seam Fastball 16%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Yarbrough, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 607 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AF Alex Freeland SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.