PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Weathers vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Weathers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Weathers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .325vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Changeup 25%Sweeper 20%Sinker 15%Slider 7%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Weathers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JW James Wood LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CA CJ Abrams LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CM Curtis Mead RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-10 game page →