PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Rolison vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Rolison's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Rolison's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .370Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Curveball 27%Slider 18%Sweeper 5%Changeup 3%Sinker 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Rolison, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 WC William Contreras RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BT Brice Turang LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 489 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SF Sal Frelick LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Jackson Chourio RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CY Christian Yelich LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (27% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-28 game page →