PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Rolison vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Rolison's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Rolison's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .273vs RHH xwOBA .375Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Curveball 25%Slider 16%Sweeper 8%Sinker 5%Changeup 2%Unknown 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Rolison, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.