PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Johnson vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Johnson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Johnson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 36%Sinker 22%Splitter 20%Sweeper 20%Slider 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Johnson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Cutter (36% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Cutter (36% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 370 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .366
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Cutter (36% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .449 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Cutter (36% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BH Bryce Harper LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Cutter (36% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Cutter (36% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Cutter (36% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Cutter (36% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Cutter (36% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-29 game page →