PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Johnson vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Johnson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Johnson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .342Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 37%Sinker 21%Splitter 20%Sweeper 20%Slider 1%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Johnson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Cutter (37% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Cutter (37% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Cutter (37% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Cutter (37% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Cutter (37% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Cutter (37% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Cutter (37% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Cutter (37% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Cutter (37% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.