PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Johnson vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Johnson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Johnson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 33%Sinker 26%Splitter 22%Sweeper 18%Slider 1%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Johnson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-25 game page →