PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Johnson vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Johnson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Johnson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 33%Sinker 26%Splitter 22%Sweeper 18%Slider 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Johnson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .412 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Cutter (33% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .236 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-31 game page →