PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Johnson vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Johnson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Johnson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 39%Sweeper 23%Splitter 19%Sinker 18%Slider 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Johnson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Cutter (39% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Cutter (39% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Cutter (39% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Cutter (39% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Cutter (39% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Cutter (39% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Cutter (39% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Cutter (39% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Cutter (39% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.