PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Johnson vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Johnson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Johnson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 38%Sweeper 21%Sinker 20%Splitter 19%Slider 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Johnson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Cutter (38% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Cutter (38% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Cutter (38% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Cutter (38% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Cutter (38% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Cutter (38% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Cutter (38% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Cutter (38% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Cutter (38% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.