PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Feltner vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Feltner's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Feltner's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .330vs RHH xwOBA .329Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 22%Changeup 16%Sinker 13%Curveball 9%Sweeper 9%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Feltner, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 BB Byron Buxton RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Byron Buxton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BL Brooks Lee SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 KC Kody Clemens SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AM Austin Martin RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VC Victor Caratini SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RL Royce Lewis RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-28 game page →