PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Feltner vs Kansas City Royals

How the Kansas City Royals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Feltner's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Feltner's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .340vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 21%Changeup 17%Sinker 14%Curveball 8%Sweeper 8%

How the Kansas City Royals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Kansas City Royals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Feltner, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 SP Salvador Perez RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Salvador Perez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 477 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BW Bobby Witt Jr. RHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bobby Witt Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CJ Carter Jensen LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carter Jensen
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jac Caglianone LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jac Caglianone
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IC Isaac Collins SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Isaac Collins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 VP Vinnie Pasquantino LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vinnie Pasquantino
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 582 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Michael Massey LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Massey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nick Loftin RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Loftin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 KI Kyle Isbel LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Isbel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.