PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Feltner vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Feltner's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Feltner's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .340vs RHH xwOBA .314Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 23%Changeup 16%Sinker 14%Curveball 9%Sweeper 9%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Feltner, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SS Spencer Steer RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Steer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 559 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JB JJ Bleday LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 TF TJ Friedl LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-19 game page →