PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Feltner vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Feltner's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Feltner's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .327Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 22%Changeup 17%Sinker 14%Curveball 9%Sweeper 9%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Feltner, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 529 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MM Matt McLain RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TF TJ Friedl LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 EA Edwin Arroyo SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edwin Arroyo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.