PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Feltner vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Feltner's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Feltner's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .341vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 22%Changeup 16%Sinker 14%Curveball 9%Sweeper 9%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Feltner, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 591 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 591 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CK Christian Koss RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  8. 8 VB Victor Bericoto RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Bericoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.