PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Feltner vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Feltner's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Feltner's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .339vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 22%Changeup 17%Sinker 14%Curveball 8%Sweeper 8%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Feltner, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 652 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 607 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.