PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Feltner vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Feltner's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Feltner's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .341vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 22%Changeup 16%Sinker 14%Curveball 9%Sweeper 9%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Feltner, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 602 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 558 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-12 game page →