PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Feltner vs Chicago Cubs

How the Chicago Cubs's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Feltner's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Feltner's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .348vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 22%Changeup 16%Sinker 14%Curveball 9%Sweeper 9%

How the Chicago Cubs's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago Cubs's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Feltner, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 NH Nico Hoerner RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nico Hoerner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 AB Alex Bregman RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Bregman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 PC Pete Crow-Armstrong LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Crow-Armstrong
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Michael Busch LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Busch
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 545 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IH Ian Happ SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ian Happ
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 578 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DS Dansby Swanson RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dansby Swanson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 466 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 SS Seiya Suzuki RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Seiya Suzuki
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CK Carson Kelly RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Kelly
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MC Michael Conforto LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Conforto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.