PITCHER MATCHUP

Ryan Feltner vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ryan Feltner's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ryan Feltner's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .327Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 22%Changeup 17%Sinker 14%Curveball 9%Sweeper 9%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ryan Feltner, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 636 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 474 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 LT Lane Thomas RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lane Thomas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .408 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-29 game page →