PITCHER MATCHUP

Robert Stock vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robert Stock's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robert Stock's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .411Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 32%Sinker 25%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Sweeper 10%Changeup 10%Unknown 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robert Stock, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT José Tena LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BH Brady House RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-14 game page →