PITCHER MATCHUP

Robert Stock vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robert Stock's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robert Stock's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .358Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Sinker 23%Sweeper 12%Changeup 8%Knuckle Curve 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robert Stock, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 506 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .369
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .422 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.