PITCHER MATCHUP

Robert Stock vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robert Stock's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robert Stock's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .411Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 32%Sinker 25%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Sweeper 10%Changeup 10%Unknown 1%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robert Stock, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 OC Owen Caissie LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JM Joe Mack LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GC Griffin Conine LHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.