PITCHER MATCHUP

Robert Stock vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robert Stock's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robert Stock's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .358Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Sinker 23%Sweeper 12%Changeup 8%Knuckle Curve 1%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robert Stock, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .223 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 GC Griffin Conine LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .412 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Agustín Ramírez RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Agustín Ramírez
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.