PITCHER MATCHUP

Robert Stock vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robert Stock's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robert Stock's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .415Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 25%Sinker 23%Sweeper 10%Changeup 10%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robert Stock, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .335
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .365
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .366
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 385 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (25% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-26 game page →