PITCHER MATCHUP

Robert Stock vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robert Stock's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robert Stock's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .358Seasons 2026–2025
Cutter 32%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Sinker 23%Sweeper 12%Changeup 8%Knuckle Curve 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robert Stock, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 589 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Cutter (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 529 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.