PITCHER MATCHUP

Robert Gasser vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robert Gasser's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robert Gasser's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .289vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 26%Sinker 23%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Cutter 19%Changeup 11%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robert Gasser, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 VC Victor Caratini SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RK Ryan Kreidler RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Kreidler
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.