PITCHER MATCHUP

Robert Gasser vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robert Gasser's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robert Gasser's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .289vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 26%Sinker 23%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Cutter 19%Changeup 11%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robert Gasser, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 619 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 KH Ke'Bryan Hayes RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT Jose Trevino RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Trevino
    • Sweeper (26% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.