PITCHER MATCHUP

Robert Gasser vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robert Gasser's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robert Gasser's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .292vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 28%Sinker 24%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Cutter 16%Changeup 9%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robert Gasser, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LH Liam Hicks LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JM Joe Mack LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LJ Leo Jiménez RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leo Jiménez
    • Sweeper (28% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-19 game page →