PITCHER MATCHUP

Robert Gasser vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robert Gasser's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robert Gasser's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .288vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 27%Sinker 25%Four-Seam Fastball 23%Cutter 16%Changeup 9%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robert Gasser, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sweeper (27% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sweeper (27% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sweeper (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 516 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sweeper (27% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Sweeper (27% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sweeper (27% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sweeper (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sweeper (27% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sweeper (27% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-01 game page →