PITCHER MATCHUP

Robbie Ray vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robbie Ray's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robbie Ray's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .307vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 24%Changeup 15%Knuckle Curve 12%Sinker 5%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robbie Ray, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 619 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .236 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-11 game page →