PITCHER MATCHUP

Robbie Ray vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robbie Ray's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robbie Ray's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 24%Changeup 15%Knuckle Curve 12%Sinker 5%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robbie Ray, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .301
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JL Josh Lowe LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.