PITCHER MATCHUP

Robbie Ray vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robbie Ray's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robbie Ray's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .328Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Slider 24%Changeup 15%Knuckle Curve 12%Sinker 8%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robbie Ray, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (12% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.