PITCHER MATCHUP

Robbie Ray vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Robbie Ray's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Robbie Ray's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Slider 25%Changeup 14%Knuckle Curve 11%Sinker 4%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Robbie Ray, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-25 game page →