PITCHER MATCHUP

Rhett Lowder vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Rhett Lowder's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Rhett Lowder's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .374vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2024
Sinker 29%Slider 27%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Changeup 20%Curveball 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Rhett Lowder, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 637 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 592 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.