PITCHER MATCHUP

Rhett Lowder vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Rhett Lowder's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Rhett Lowder's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .380vs RHH xwOBA .296Seasons 2026–2024
Sinker 30%Slider 27%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Changeup 20%Curveball 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Rhett Lowder, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Sinker (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (27% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.