PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .296vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 27%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Cutter 18%Curveball 17%Changeup 16%Slider 4%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 KK Kyle Karros RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.