PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .287vs RHH xwOBA .284Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 27%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 17%Changeup 17%Slider 3%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 WC Willi Castro SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 TF Tyler Freeman RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Freeman
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.