PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Changeup 17%Curveball 17%Slider 3%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WC Willi Castro SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 EJ Edouard Julien LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edouard Julien
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TF Tyler Freeman RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Freeman
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-24 game page →