PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .288vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 27%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 17%Changeup 17%Slider 3%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT José Tena LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 BH Brady House RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.