PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .284Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 28%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Changeup 17%Curveball 17%Slider 3%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JW James Wood LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CA CJ Abrams LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CM Curtis Mead RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-29 game page →