PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .281vs RHH xwOBA .284Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 27%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Changeup 17%Curveball 17%Slider 3%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-31 game page →