PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 27%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Cutter 18%Curveball 17%Changeup 16%Slider 4%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 620 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 489 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.