PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .290vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 27%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Cutter 18%Curveball 17%Changeup 17%Slider 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 608 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 563 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.