PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .282vs RHH xwOBA .284Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 27%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Changeup 17%Curveball 17%Slider 3%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-05 game page →