PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .296vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 27%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Cutter 18%Curveball 17%Changeup 16%Slider 4%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.