PITCHER MATCHUP

Ranger Suarez vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ranger Suarez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ranger Suarez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .288vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 27%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 17%Changeup 17%Slider 3%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ranger Suarez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 457 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 529 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.