PITCHER MATCHUP

Randy Vásquez vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Randy Vásquez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Randy Vásquez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .371vs RHH xwOBA .351Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Cutter 23%Sinker 17%Curveball 12%Sweeper 10%Changeup 8%Slider 4%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Randy Vásquez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 JB Josh Bell SH .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 510 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BL Brooks Lee SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Byron Buxton RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Byron Buxton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RL Royce Lewis RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VC Victor Caratini SH .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.