PITCHER MATCHUP

Randy Vásquez vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Randy Vásquez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Randy Vásquez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .374vs RHH xwOBA .340Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Cutter 23%Sinker 17%Curveball 11%Sweeper 9%Changeup 8%Slider 4%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Randy Vásquez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 654 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JJ Josh Jung RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CS Corey Seager LHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.