PITCHER MATCHUP

Randy Vásquez vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Randy Vásquez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Randy Vásquez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .373vs RHH xwOBA .339Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 23%Sinker 17%Curveball 11%Sweeper 9%Changeup 8%Slider 4%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Randy Vásquez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.