PITCHER MATCHUP

Randy Vásquez vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Randy Vásquez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Randy Vásquez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .379vs RHH xwOBA .358Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Cutter 23%Sinker 16%Curveball 12%Sweeper 10%Changeup 8%Slider 3%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Randy Vásquez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 596 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.