PITCHER MATCHUP

Randy Vásquez vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Randy Vásquez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Randy Vásquez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .373vs RHH xwOBA .339Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Cutter 23%Sinker 17%Curveball 11%Sweeper 9%Changeup 8%Slider 4%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Randy Vásquez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 569 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .371
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .227 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 SB Samuel Basallo LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Samuel Basallo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CC Colton Cowser LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .416 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JH Jackson Holliday LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Holliday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.