PITCHER MATCHUP

Randy Vásquez vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Randy Vásquez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Randy Vásquez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .374vs RHH xwOBA .340Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Cutter 23%Sinker 18%Curveball 11%Sweeper 9%Changeup 8%Slider 4%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Randy Vásquez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .330
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 629 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 502 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.