PITCHER MATCHUP

Randy Vásquez vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Randy Vásquez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Randy Vásquez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .379vs RHH xwOBA .358Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Cutter 23%Sinker 16%Curveball 12%Sweeper 10%Changeup 8%Slider 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Randy Vásquez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .372
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 595 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-04 game page →