PITCHER MATCHUP

Quinn Mathews vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Quinn Mathews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Quinn Mathews's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .314vs RHH xwOBA .298Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Slider 23%Changeup 16%Curveball 13%Sinker 10%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Quinn Mathews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.