PITCHER MATCHUP

Quinn Mathews vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Quinn Mathews's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Quinn Mathews's arsenal

Throws LHPvs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Slider 24%Changeup 17%Curveball 12%Sinker 5%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Quinn Mathews, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 605 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 477 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 AF Alex Freeland SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.