PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .283Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 24%Slider 13%Cutter 10%Sinker 9%SV 9%Sweeper 4%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .416 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.