PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .298vs RHH xwOBA .289Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 23%Slider 14%Cutter 9%Sinker 9%SV 9%Sweeper 3%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 548 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-26 game page →