PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .304vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 24%Slider 14%Cutter 10%SV 9%Sinker 9%Sweeper 3%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .428 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TP Tristan Peters LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-31 game page →