PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .314vs RHH xwOBA .282Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Changeup 24%Slider 13%Cutter 10%SV 9%Sinker 9%Sweeper 4%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 VC Victor Caratini SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AM Austin Martin RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 1 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RK Ryan Kreidler RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Kreidler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.