PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .313vs RHH xwOBA .282Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 23%Slider 13%Cutter 10%Sinker 9%SV 9%Sweeper 4%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .263
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .229 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JD Jonny DeLuca RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonny DeLuca
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RP Richie Palacios LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.