PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .283Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 24%Slider 13%Cutter 10%Sinker 9%SV 9%Sweeper 4%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.