PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .307vs RHH xwOBA .289Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 24%Slider 14%Cutter 10%SV 9%Sinker 8%Sweeper 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 628 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 582 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .213 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-06 game page →