PITCHER MATCHUP

Peter Lambert vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Peter Lambert's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Peter Lambert's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .283Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Changeup 24%Slider 13%Cutter 10%Sinker 9%SV 9%Sweeper 4%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Peter Lambert, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 690 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 540 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JJ Jim Jarvis LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jim Jarvis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SM Sean Murphy RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sean Murphy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.